Re: Ayuda con mkv
Publicado: 09 Feb 2013 01:49
I try this way but I have also noticed that the sar it gives was changeable. And the software shows that it's ITU or not and it's not judging by myself. Is that correct?
professor keller escribió:Hi Alan,
First, welcome to Cinefórum-Clásico! Second, I'm afraid I'm not the "king" mentioned by Bunker; I'm just a guy who learnt a couple of things from some wizz kids. If you want to contact some more experienced rippers than me you should try Dardo or Roisiano (not sure if they can communicate in English though).
Just a few comments on you notes:
Yes, if you're aiming for quality, there's a big difference. Preset veryslow is far more efficient to get the most of the encoding process.xuguang_he escribió: As for "--preset", is there a big difference between "slow" and "veryslow"? The loss in picture quality or anything else?
Yes, --no-chroma-me (or other similar presets) is just to keep the picture in pure B&W with no color deviation. And you don't have to judge it at all: if you are about to rip an entirely B&W film, just use it. You only need to be completely sure that the original film was shot in B&W and doesn't have any color or tinted scenes on it.xuguang_he escribió:I have also noticed that, in some of the black-and-white pictures rip, rippers use this in command line: --no-chroma-me. What does it mean? Just to keep the picture in black-and-white and not to have color deviation? And how could I judge when should I use this or not?
You could, but you better don'txuguang_he escribió:As for the "--sar", could I use ARS Calculator to calculate out the sar number?In all my knowledge, the best way to get the best SAR calculation is using your eyes. You just need to copy some code on notepad and save it as *.avs file (you must edit all paths, of course). I'm quoting elguaxo:
Regarding filters, best rippers usually doesn't like filters (mostly). Generally speaking, we're not interested in "improving" the source. Our aim is to get the most of the DVD in order to produce the most "transparent" rip that we can.elguaxo escribió:We'll save the script as my.movie.avs. It looks for example like this one:
From DGIndex's report we are going to see if the DVD is PAL/NTSC, Fullscreen/Widescreen. Remember:Código: Seleccionar todo
DGDecode_mpeg2source("I:\VTS_01_1.demuxed.d2v") crop( 52, 14, -52, -14)
720x576 = PAL
720x480 = NTSC
4:3 = Fullscreen
16:9 = Widescreen
We'll save this script below as SAR.avs under the same folder of my.movie.avs. We are going to edit format and wide according to the data reported by DGIndex.
Let's open SAR.avs in VDM. Don't mind the black border's you'll see now, just focus on the AR. Look at many many screens to decide if it's ITU or not. The third line says x264 --sar and a number, for example 40:33. Write it down. That's the Pixel Aspect Ratio aka SAR (Sample Aspect Ratio).
Código: Seleccionar todo
avsfile = "my.movie.avs" # Encoding script format = 1 # 1=NTSC, 0=PAL wide = 1 # 1=Widescreen 16:9, 0=Full screen 4:3 ######################### ITU = (format==1?10:12)/11.0*(wide==1?4.0/3:1) SARs = """"12:11","16:11","10:11","40:33","16:15","64:45","8:9","32:27"""" ITUprof = "SDB "+(wide==1?"ANAMORPHIC ":"")+(format==1?"NTSC":"PAL") i=import(avsfile).converttorgb i ab = round(height*(sqrt(45.0/44)-1)) a = spline36resize(round(width*ITU),height) a = a.addborders(0,floor(ab/2.0),0,ceil(ab/2.0)) bb = width(a)-round(width*ITU/sqrt(45.0/44)) b = spline36resize(round(width*ITU/sqrt(45.0/44)),height+ab) b = b.addborders(floor(bb/2.0),0,ceil(bb/2.0),0) interleave(a,b) scriptclip("""subtitle("Playback Resolution: "+\ string(round(width(i)*ITU*pow(44.0/45,current_frame%2)))+"x"+string(height(i))+\ "\nMeGUI Profile: "+ITUprof+(current_frame%2==1?" NON-ITU":"")+\ "\nx264 --sar "+eval("select(2*format+wide+current_frame%2*4,"+SARs+")"),lsp=0)""")
Best regards!